Amid growing concerns over election security, the Department of Justice (DOJ) reaffirms a Civil War-era statute to prevent armed federal agents from posing a threat at polling places. That this is an issue at all reflects where we are as a country. How did we get so polarized?
DOJ’s Guidance on Election Day Conduct
Federal law enforcement agents have been cautioned against responding to polling locations while armed, drawing upon Title 18, U.S. Code, Section 592. This law, issued during the Civil War, renders it a felony for armed federal officials to be present at active polling sites for crowd control. The memo issued by Corey R. Amundson, chief of the DOJ’s Public Integrity Section, emerged after inquiries on potential threats. Resurfacing this statute aims to deter intimidation and reinforce election integrity.
The guidance comes on the heels of alarming reports, including a thwarted ISIS plot, heightening vigilance around Election Day. This is not the first time such directives have appeared; however, this iteration has attracted attention due to recent security concerns. The caution also extends to false reports potentially prompting unwarranted armed responses, further complicating electoral processes.
If you encounter violence, threats, or intimidation at a polling place, call 911 immediately. After alerting local authorities, report the incident to the Justice Department.
For election-related complaints, contact the FBI: https://t.co/psjiI0c3qy pic.twitter.com/XyBx2H1Doz
— U.S. Department of Justice (@TheJusticeDept) November 4, 2024
Understanding Title 18, Section 592
Title 18, Section 592, originating from concerns over military interference in elections, prohibits armed federal response at polling sites, except for personal voting or emergencies that halt polling operations. Retired FBI agent Jeff Danik critiqued the DOJ memo’s communication as unnecessarily complex. He suggested adopting a clearer approach to the process of deploying federal responses only during genuine public safety emergencies.
Operational chains of command on Election Day include District Election Officers and FBI Election Crime Coordinators, ensuring responses align with legal and procedural frameworks. These measures prevent unauthorized presences and maintain communication channels with state and local authorities.
Spreading false information about voting times or locations is a serious offense. The Justice Department is vigilant in prosecuting those who try to mislead voters. #KnowYourRights pic.twitter.com/52GmxFQvDN
— U.S. Department of Justice (@TheJusticeDept) October 31, 2024
Election Monitoring in 27 States
The DOJ’s monitoring on November 5 involves observing compliance with federal voting rights in 86 jurisdictions across 27 states, including states like Florida, Georgia, and Texas. The department’s efforts facilitate voter access while safeguarding against disenfranchisement. The Civil Rights Division coordinates these efforts, confirming compliance with laws such as the Voting Rights Act and the National Voter Registration Act.
Specialized departments oversee related issues, such as the Americans with Disabilities Act adherence.
This operation underscores the DOJ’s firm stance on secure, lawful elections and illustrates how historical laws can remain relevant in addressing modern electoral challenges. By emphasizing collaboration and clarified structural responses, federal authorities aim to reassure the public and maintain confidence in democratic processes.
Yea the dem-a-rats want there people to intimidate older white people from voting. Let me hear about it and bikers from around the country will embark to protect our voting rights if the government will not do there job.#Trump.